UK: Major funder of the Labour party exposed as a supporter of a racist bigot.

(London) Max Mosley is a very rich man, he is also the son of Oswold Mosley  who became infamous during the 1930s as the leader of the British Fascist party. (Who found out the hard way in 1936 when he tried to march through the Jewish area of Cable St, that the British didn't subscribe to the Nazis craze which was very popular across the channel in Europe) .

Max has always denied subscribing to his fathers bigoted ways and 10 years ago successfully sued the media when they ran a story about him throwing Nazis themed sex parties. Of late he has become a major funder for the socialist labour party in the UK,  of whom the deputy leader Tom Watson has received well over £500,000. In return Watson supported Mosleys attempts to shackle the free press, you know like Hitler did. During the above court case Mosley categorically denied putting out racist election leaflets at the Moss Side by-election in 1961 which said 'coloured immigrants' spread 'tuberculosis, VD and other terrible diseases like leprosy' and should be sent 'home'. The leaflet added: 'Coloured immigration threatens your children's health.'  When asked about the existence of that leaflet in the High Court, Mr Mosley said:

'If there was such a leaflet, you would be able to produce it', adding he could 'not recall' it. He said it was 'absolute nonsense' to suggest such a pamphlet was put out."

Yesterday, a copy of that leaflet turned up and the press, have not only handed a copy to the crown prosecution service, they have asked prosecutors to ask Scotland Yard to consider whether Max Mosley committed perjury at his orgy privacy trial. 

I have to laugh how when asked in the above TV train crash, if he believed in sending immigrants home in 1961, He says no, he believed in offering financial inducements to persuade Jamaicans to go home,  He then states that the document is a fake, and that if it is true his lawyers want to look at it. Only to be told it can be found in 2 different libraries.

On hearing the above news, Labour have said they will no longer accept any more money from Mr Mosely, but will not return the monies received.  So much for that socialist mantra of not supporting racist bigoted ways.

The left of political centre

(UK) I came across this letter whilst reading The Guardian today. It perfectly illustrates the duplicity of the left on how they operate. That actually the people throwing all the allegations of hate since Trump, Brexit who are actually the biggest haters around are those people from the left.

Do you know what I love about the Guardian’s opposition to racism? It’s always stops at the border of white victims. I don’t suspect it’s interested in the trending hashtag #RapeMelania, or #AssassinateTrump, or the thousands of tweets sent threatening to kill, stab or maim Nigel Farage.
 
Nor is it concerned about placards at Remain protests inscribed with ‘old white men, please die.’ Or articles in mainstream publications (GQ) calling for the disenfranchisement of old people. Nor is it concerned with quotes like this, from Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, on white men:
 
“I don’t like them. I want them to be a lost species in a hundred years.” Nor are they concerned about Lena Dunham, a woman with 5 million followers and who appeared on Hillary’s campaign trail (she even interviewed her), calling for the extinction of white men. Or Pat Glass (Labour MP) proclaiming ‘old white men are the problem.’
 
It’s why it couldn’t care less about Harvard professor’s, and this is in his own words, advocating ‘abolishing the white race.’ It’s why it couldn’t care less about the BBC parading ‘black heroes’ or ‘black culture’, knowing full well a simple context switch would be met by its own calls of a return to fascism.
 
It’s why it couldn’t care less about The BBC writing horrifically sexist articles like ‘do we need men?’, or the Independent going one further and writing an article entitled ‘white men should never hold elected position in British Universities again.’ It’s why it couldn’t care less about Sharon Osbourne laughing hysterically on a panel full of women, and for six minutes, about a woman chopping her husband’s penis off with a kitchen knife.
 
I suspect that’s because their opposition to sexism isn’t actually opposition to sexism, it stops at the border of female perpetrators/male victims. It’s why they were the leading light in reporting and activism on Boko Haram kidnapping 250 girls, alongside an endless conveyor belt of celebrities, politicians and even the world’s largest intelligence services. What they weren’t concerned about was the 10,000 boys kidnapped, however.
 
You see, that can’t be exploited as a gender narrative. It’s why it has no problem with horrifically racist and sexist terms like ‘too white’, ‘white privilege’ and ‘toxic masculinity’, which, were they delivered in any other context would be met by, again, its own calls of a return to fascism.
 
There’s mountains of this stuff, none of which is met with the level of outrage reserved for a world-class scientist who wore a garment depicting a naked cartoon female and who was forced into a grovelling apology, live on-air.
 
Do you know the worst part about all of this? This isn’t some random racist or sexist on the street, these are prominent members of the intelligentsia and people in positions of power.
 
Then again, it doesn’t actually oppose anything; it’s just accentuates, repeats, contextualises, omits or rationalises ‘truth’, or filters it by the identity of the perpetrator or victim. It’s also fully comfortable with homophobia, its opposition stops at the border of fawning over a homophobic communist tyrant.
 
It’s perfectly comfortable with sexism, racism and homophobia, in fact it propagates it. It only ever opposes it when it’s politically convenient to do so, in other instances – white male victims – it just omits it from the narrative, or contextualises and rationalises it.
 
Why? Because it isn’t actually liberal. Progressivism (collectivism, eg, the common good) has, since its inception, been set-up to oppose classical liberalism (individualism) and fight for what it deems is the ‘common good.’
 
The common good, as advocated by progressivism (feminists, leading politicians, intellectuals, even Supreme Court Judges, etc.), in the 1920’s, was eugenics, and forced sterilisation of citizens it deemed ‘unfit’ or ‘lacking in education’ (remind you of anything?) in the hope of manufacturing a superior (white) race. It served as a blueprint for the Nazi variant, an ideology which went onto slaughter hundreds of thousands of disabled people.
 
The ‘common good’ was also, as far as H.G. Wells, a founding member of ‘the progressive league’, was concerned, was support for what he termed ‘liberal fascism.’ You see, that’s the problem with ‘the common good’ and prioritising the collective ahead of the individual: soon enough, inevitably, it will turn round and attack you.
 
Of course, this is all enforced with a religious devotion to the principles of cultural and moral relativism, a framework which would, when extended, deem interfering with a National Socialist’s right to perpetrate the holocaust ‘ethnocentric’ or ‘racist.’ The Guardian doesn’t do ethics, morality or principles, and it certainly doesn’t have any respect for intellectual consistency.

The above letter to an article (written by this person) about the rise of racism in the UK  was deemed to have broken the rules for not abiding to The Guardian's community standards and so it was deleted. But you know what, it sums up the left to a T.

UK: Media covers up the bigotry of so called vulnerable children

For months now, the liberals have painted this picture that we should think about the children of Syria. You know, those 20-30-year-old men who the ethical latte drinkers try to hoodwink you into thinking they are infants and that the UK should do the right thing by importing them into the country in their thousands.

Apparently, France, a part of the wonderful EU, isn't deemed to be a safe place for non-white people. But hey, the so called racist UK is. Have a butchers at this Guardian article in which to see what I mean:

Most Calais camp child refugees ‘traumatised and depressed’

Nearly all of the children who stayed in the now demolished Calais camp for refugees have a mental health condition such as post-traumatic stress disorder or depression, according to psychiatric assessments of some of those waiting to come to Britain…. Citizens UK estimates hundreds of them have a legal right to sanctuary in the UK, but on Friday, following more than a week of delays, the government confirmed that none would be transferred this weekend. Charities have called on the government to resume transfers to the UK immediately.

As mentioned, the left go to great lengths in which to spin the lie that these so called children would all contribute to making the UK a better place. Which is why Ch4 News did a huge cover up on what a child in Syria actually said:

Awks moment when Channel 4 News translates "they're all infidels" into "I will not leave" & then tries to fix it a few hours later. pic.twitter.com/4YthQxUiK5

— Lina Arabi (@LinaArabii) November 4, 2016

Vid starts with the kid saying "they're all infidels". Channel4 still snuck in "I will not leave" in the correction. https://t.co/BqsTl9rbSE pic.twitter.com/G1Pw55vw6F

— Lina Arabi (@LinaArabii) November 4, 2016

Dallas massacre was "well-planned", "well-thought-out", "racially motivated"

Dallas police Chief David Brown provided more details during a prayer rally Friday.

"Through our investigation of some of the suspects, it's revealed to us that this was a well-planned, well-thought-out, evil tragedy," he said.

The Dallas police chief said the attacks on his officers were racially motivated [...]

Police in Dallas: ‘He wanted to kill white people, especially white officers’

Dallas Police Chief David Brown said Friday that Johnson had told authorities “he was upset about the recent police shootings” and “wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.” Brown said Johnson made the remarks before he was killed by a bomb-carrying robot that had been sent into his location and then detonated by police.

The Truth About the Dallas Sniper Attack

A cold hard look at the Black Lives Matter protest group and the killings of 5 Policemen in Dallas.

New US medal for campaign against Islamic State

(Washington) The Pentagon showed off their latest medal for its servicemen and women who deploy out to the Middle East in which to take on ISIS. To qualify , a service member "must have been present in Iraq, Syria, or the contiguous waters or airspace of either country, on or after June 15, 2014, for a period of 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days," according to a Pentagon statement. "Service members who were killed or were medically evacuated due to wounds or injuries immediately qualify for the award, as do members who engaged in combat."

The front side of the new medal features an image of a sword piercing a scorpion -The hand clutching the sword appears to be wearing armor, and the sword itself is a variant of one commonly used in earlier U.S. military insignias. Known as the Sword of Liberation, the blade is prominently displayed in the emblem of U.S. Army Europe — although in the Inherent Resolve Campaign Medal, the sword is more of a dagger and the hilt is slightly altered. The reverse side of the medal has an eagle perched atop a banner that says, "For service."

Explosion heard in Lebanon Bekaa Valley, everybody looking at Israel

(Lebanon) A huge explosion has been heard in Lebanons Bekaa Valley, and without knowing where it was and what it was, the resident terrorist outfit for hire 'Hezb-allah' have made their mind up that it was Israel and that they were destroying a UAV that had come down.

Here is how a proper news agency should report this story:

A blast occurred in near the town of Saghbein in a remote area of Lebanon's western Bekaa region on Sunday, but the cause of it was not yet known, Lebanese security sources said.

One of the sources said the explosion could have been caused by an Israeli air strike on Lebanon, while another said an Israeli drone may have been downed.

The sources refused to give further details, with one saying that a "proper investigation" was still to be undertaken into the blast. It was not clear if there were casualties.

An Israeli military spokeswoman declined to comment.

New 'Peace Flotilla' to set sail from Sicily for Gaza

(Sicily) Currently, hundreds of thousands of people are sailing up to 17 miles off the coast of Libya in which to get picked up by EU ships in which to be transported to the Italian mainland in search of a new life. The subject is a bone of contention with every EU state and is still being played out.

Meanwhile in Sicily, another flotilla of boats is getting ready to make the journey in the opposite direction. Yes, it's that time of year when the liberals of the world who remain silent on Hamas, Boko Haram, ISIS, the Taliban, Al Qaeda and the rest on their murderous ways in which to have a dig at Israel. So in order to do so, they have put together a motley collection of small boats in which to break the blockade on Gaza.

Oh, hang on, did I say break the blockade? Here is what the 'Rear Admiral' of this flotilla has to say on the matter of taking aid to Gaza:

Activist Kalle Ohlsson said the flotilla's main objective was not to bring aid, but to open Gaza's port to allow freedom of movement and trade.

Hang on, did I read that right? Maybe Kalle should read the news more often, as this is what happened between Gaza and Israel only 2 days ago.

Israel allows 660 trucks into Gaza

Not only that but Kalle has this to say as well:

"Our aim is to end the siege of Gaza. We want the Palestinians to know that we haven't forgotten about them. There are many crises in the world, but the situation in Gaza is also really bad, and we do remember them."

Really, as here is what was happening between Israel and Hamas also 2 days ago:

Israel, Hamas hold indirect talks for long-term truce

I did love reading about the group's concerns for their safety:

Ohlsson says there are also concerns about how the Israeli military will react once the boats reach international waters.

"We're very concerned about safety. We have a strict non-violence policy. We're hoping Israel won't use violence against us."

Let's hope they don't get caught by any jihadists who, I'm sure you'll agree, would be more than happy to make a home video with these so called peace loving idiots. You know, those videos that begin with an "Allahu Akbar" and end with a scream. Funny enough, as bad as these people make out the Jews are, I've yet to see anybody made into a film star in such a way at the hands of the IDF.

Funny that.

The Media Intifada: Bad Math, Ugly Truths About New York Times In Israel-Hamas War

The Media Intifada: Bad Math, Ugly Truths About New York Times In Israel-Hamas War

(Forbes) It’s a “media intifada,” notes Gary Weiss, an old colleague and one of the world’s top business investigative reporters. He is referring of course to the ongoing war in Gaza, where journalists working for American news outlets have, he says, “become part of the Hamas war machine.”

As more than a month has passed since Israel began its Operation Protective Edge in Gaza, it’s high time to dig through the carnage that many of my colleagues from major U.S. media outlets are leaving behind—especially the New York Times.

Read the whole thing here.

Major British newspaper breaks ranks, defends Israel, attacks radical Islam

(London) The Daily Express has come out with an article where Israel — yes, Israel — is publicly defended and where it states that the real enemy is the black flag of jihad. Wow:

Stop blaming Israel and wake up: The black flag of jihad is the REAL threat to the world

Jews are attacked here in Britain, they are blockaded into a synagogue in Paris and the chant ‘Death to the Jews’ is heard in Germany for the first time in 70 years. But too few people seem to want to notice this or admit what it means. They think this is just about Israel, or just about Jewish people. It isn’t. It is about all of us.

The decision last month by the Israeli government to respond to Hamas rocket-fire from Gaza is the response any government would choose if rockets were fired at its citizens. The Israeli government has the right - as does any government - to stop the bombarding of its people.

However, in recent weeks it has become plain that much of the world expects a different response from Israel. They expect Israel not to fight for the safety, security and survival of their people, but to lie down in front of the Islamic extremist enemy.

The UK government has even - disgracefully - stopped selling some arms to Israel just when the country needs such weapons most. But in expecting Israel to behave differently from the rest of us our societies and governments reveal far more about our own state than the State of Israel.

Because the truth is that behind the demands for Israel to lie down in front of its enemies is a fatal unwillingness of our own to face the problem which is in our midst.

Read the rest here.