Friday, August 31, 2018

Interlude: R.E.M. - Shiny Happy People

Friday, August 24, 2018

Germany: 17 year old Syrian asylum seeker tells court he is justified by Islam to stab women to death

(Hanover)  A court case in Germany has shocked the nation after Abdullah Aa 17 year old Syrian asylum seeker who has resided in Germany since 2013 confessed to a knife attack on a 24-year-old German woman,  by insisting his violent act was justified by Islam.

 “In my culture, you may kill,”
In March of this year, an argument occurred between a group of Syrians and 2 German lads inside a supermarket., when a 24 year old women intervened, she was stabbed by Abdullah resulting in him breaking her ribs and injuring her liver, stomach, kidney and intestines. she was placed in an induced coma to save her life. In court his brief stated:
"The accused knows from his culture that conflicts with the knife are carried out. He describes the regional customs as follows: If one insults, one may stab. In severe cases, one may kill the person. "And:" He states that his behavior was not objectionable to the religious requirements and does not understand why he must be detained. "
 Abdullah who sees himself as a model refugee will be sentence on September the 11th.

UK: Yusuf jailed for 5 years after stabbing a stranger because he wanted attention.

(Leicester) 22 year old Yusuf Aka has been jailed for 5 years in the UK over how in January this year he attacked people with a 8 inch hunting knife inside a hospital because he felt he wasn't receiving the attention he wanted.



At around 2am on the 16th of January Aka on release from a 7 year prison sentence for armed robbery which he received in 2013 approached the entrance of Leicester Royal Infirmary and as he passed 2 men walking past he stabbed one in the back and then proceeded to chase them. On giving up that endeavour he entered the emergency room and proceeded to attack patients and staff whilst trashing the room. He was brought down by 2 security guards, who held him down until the police arrived.


Whilst being interviewed, he stated that he did what he did as he wanted attention.  In his defence, his brief stated that his client has…mental health issues. He was jailed for 5 years, with an additional 5 years on licence if he offends again when released.  You do have to ask the question, what planet does the judge come from, as you know, Yusuf is going to carry out another crime on his release, resulting in the death of an innocent person.

Interlude:Harold Faltermeyer - Axel F

Thursday, August 23, 2018

What is it with how the West excuses Islamic intolerance.

Have you noticed how the authorities in the west go well out of their way in which to excuse attacks carried out by Muslims in the West. Last week outside Parliament a Sudanese asylum seeker decided to drive into around 15 cyclists and then decided to ram his car into the vehicle barrier outside Parliament.  Whilst he has now been charged with terrorism, the news that was released by the media was he was a good boy who simply wanted to pick up a visa to visit the land he left in fear for his life in which to visit family. Really?


The other-day in Spain a Muslim walked into a Police station and rushed two policemen with a knife whilst uttering 'Allah Ackba', unfortunately for him, they brought guns to his knife-fight and he was shot dead. The excuse, he had mental health problems and he had just come out as gay and couldn't live with it. 

Yesterday in Paris, a man was shot dead by police after he murdered his mother and sister and injured a third person on the street. As in Spain he rushed the Polcie whilst uttering 'Allah ackba' and he was shot dead. Polcie are now saying that eh had mental health problems and it was simply a family dispute. (dispute the fact he attacked a stranger in the street as well as the police)

Across Europe, the Police now issue statements after nearly every Jihadi attack claiming the attacker had mental health problems.

In the Uk, the Police go much further and will make a public statement about fears about attacks on the Islamic community by the far right (Which is actually far less common than attacks by Muslims who represent 3% of the population) 

Lets be honest here, its as if the authorities are trying to hide the fact, that a large section of the Islamic population across Europe are at war with everybody else. Instead of caring more about their human rights, wouldn't it be refreshing if they simply arrested, jailed, deported these people thus allowing everybody else (Including the millions of peaceful Muslims living in the West) to live in peace. But we don't, as the idiots in charge don't want to be seem as...racists.


Friday, August 17, 2018

Interlude:Thompson Twins - Love on Your Side

Friday, August 10, 2018

Regards the Islamic Burka and Niqab

Interlude:A Flock Of Seagulls - Space Age Love Song

Thursday, August 9, 2018

Al Jazeera: Plays victim card for ISIS families, who claim to be living in fear in Iraq.

(Baghdad)  ISIS burst onto the worlds stage in 2014, when it captured a huge amount of land from Iraq and Syria. Forming their own caliphate , where a most severe form of Islamic Sharia law was implemented and in order to control the people they had captured they carried out the most evil and brutal forms of murder in which them under control and to make others fear them. However like all evil empires, willing to use terror in which to expand its borders, the locals fought back and today the so called Islamic state empire is no more, as a viable fighting force it is spent with the vast majority of its terrorists dead or incarcerated and the people (who are still alive) in areas which were occupied by ISIS are slowly trying to rebuild their lives.

But to the media, ISIS have become the latest in a long line of victims demanding justice. We saw snippets of this with the faux concern about European school girls who decided to up sticks and bugger off to Syria for a life of Jihad, whilst ISIS was growing and now they have been captured by the locals in the area, all we hear from the do-gooders is these poor children (and their own children) should be brought back in which to return to a normal way of life. 
We saw this with how the left (and the media) opined about how Jihadi terrorists were taken out by airstrikes , and that not only did this infringe their human rights, but they should have been captured and brought to trial.
We saw that with how the left are crying out about how the de facto ISIS capital 'Raqqa' was bombed , claiming that we should have simply arrested these religious bigots willing to die for allah, which funny enough many did, taking a lot of people with them.
Currently we are seeing the left demanding that captured ISIS terrorists not be sent to the US, as they could be sentenced to death and they (unlike their many victims) have human rights.
And now to cap all of the above Al Jazeera had knocked out a report about how captured ISIS families (with the females unrepentant about belong to ISIS) fear for their lives living in Iraq. Oh dear whatever should we do about these intolerant  people  who unlike the vast majority of their victims are not only alive, but they are living it large with all the mod cons of the world they detested so much. What is it about the left , the do-gooders and the plain stupid in shedding faux tears for the most evil people to have walked the planet these past 5 years. Here's the video, you may require a sickbag.

UK: The fake outrage over Boris Johnson.

(London)  These last few days the professional offended class, you know, those who are offended by anything and everything have decided that a news paper article written by British MP 'Boris Johnson' was racist and are demanding his head. leading this charge are naturally the worse culprits going, Muslims. Rather than join the braying hounds snapping at his feet, it would help if we actually took the time to read what he wrote, regards Denmark banning the Burka, which tells me, that the people who are screaming the loudest , haven't bothered their arse in actually reading an article which actually defends Muslims women's right to cover up.

Denmark has got it wrong. Yes, the burka is oppressive and ridiculous – but that’s still no reason to ban it
Ah Denmark, what a country. If any society breathes the spirit of liberty, this is it.
It was only a few weeks ago that I was in Copenhagen for some international conference, and as ever I rose early and went for a run. As I passed through some yuppie zone of warehouse conversions and posh restaurants I saw to my amazement that the Danes had also got up early for exercise – and they were diving stark naked into the bracing waters of the harbour. And I thought to myself – that’s the Danes for you; that’s the spirit of Viking individualism. I mean, we have a climate warmer than Denmark; but even so, would you expect to see Brits disrobing and plunging into the waters of Canary Wharf, or even Greenwich? We are pretty easy-going, but not that easy-going.
If you wanted to visit a country that seemed on the face of it to embody the principles of JS Mill – that you should be able to do what you want provided you do no harm to others – I would advise you to head for wonderful, wonderful Copenhagen
Denmark is the only country in Europe, as far as I know, that still devotes a large proportion of its capital city to an anarchist commune, called Christiania, where I remember spending a happy afternoon 25 years ago inhaling the sweet air of freedom. It is the Danes who still hold out against all sorts of EU tyrannies, large and small.
They still chew their lethal carcinogenic tobacco; they still eat their red-dyed frankfurters; they still use the krone rather than the euro; they still refuse to let foreigners buy holiday homes in Jutland; and of course it was the heroic population of Denmark that on that magnificent day in June 1992 stuck two fingers up to the elites of Europe and voted down the Maastricht treaty – and though that revolt was eventually crushed by the European establishment (as indeed, note, they will try to crush all such revolts), that great nej to Maastricht expressed something about the Danish spirit: a genial and happy cussedness and independence.
It is a spirit you see everywhere on the streets of Copenhagen in the veneration for that supreme embodiment of vehicular autonomy, the bicycle. The Danes don’t cycle with their heads down, grimly, in Lycra, swearing at people who get in their way. They wander and weave helmetless down the beautiful boulevards on clapped-out granny bikes, with a culture of cycling in which everyone is treated with courtesy and respect. Yes, if you wanted to visit a country that seemed on the face of it to embody the principles of JS Mill – that you should be able to do what you want provided you do no harm to others – I would advise you to head for wonderful, wonderful Copenhagen.
If you tell me that the burqa is oppressive, then I am with you. If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree
So I was a bit surprised to see that on August 1 the Danes joined several other European countries – France, Germany, Austria, Belgium – in imposing a ban on the niqab and the burka – those items of Muslim head-gear that obscure the female face. Already a fine of 1000 kroner – about £120 – has been imposed on a 28-year-old woman seen wearing a niqab in a shopping centre in the north eastern town of Horsholm. A scuffle broke out as someone tried to rip it off her head. There have been demonstrations, on both sides of the argument. What has happened, you may ask, to the Danish spirit of live and let live?
If you tell me that the burka is oppressive, then I am with you. If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree – and I would add that I can find no scriptural authority for the practice in the Koran. I would go further and say that it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes; and I thoroughly dislike any attempt by any – invariably male – government to encourage such demonstrations of “modesty”, notably the extraordinary exhortations of President Ramzan Kadyrov of Chechnya, who has told the men of his country to splat their women with paintballs if they fail to cover their heads.
I am against a total ban because it is inevitably construed – rightly or wrongly – as being intended to make some point about Islam
If a constituent came to my MP’s surgery with her face obscured, I should feel fully entitled – like Jack Straw – to ask her to remove it so that I could talk to her properly. If a female student turned up at school or at a university lecture looking like a bank robber then ditto: those in authority should be allowed to converse openly with those that they are being asked to instruct. As for individual businesses or branches of government – they should of course be able to enforce a dress code that enables their employees to interact with customers; and that means human beings must be able to see each other’s faces and read their expressions. It’s how we work.
All that seems to me to be sensible. But such restrictions are not quite the same as telling a free-born adult woman what she may or may not wear, in a public place, when she is simply minding her own business.

After actually reading the above, do you find offence with it? I don't and yet the ethical latte class feel it is racist. Really, please point out where.


US: Staving children found in New Mexico taught to attack US Schools

(Amalia) On Friday armed police stormed a compound near the Colorado/New Mexico  border, on Friday to search for three-year-old Abdul-Ghani Wahhaj, who went missing last year from his home in Georgia by his father, 39-year-old Siraj Wahhaj. Instead of finding the ill child they found

five adults and 11 other children who "looked like third-world country refugees," living in squalor with little food and no clean water.


Whilst the FBI had the compound under aerial surveillance.  Law enforcement only acted after they were alerted by a police detective that he had received a message from one of the "females asking for help, stating the family was starving and needed money and food." The raid failed to find the child, but after speaking to one of the children, they found he had died and been buried, and his remains were found on Monday. But the story gets darker, apparently the father of the child and the leader of this cult was teaching the children to attack schools in the US. Gee get that, brainwashing children to murder others simply because they subscribed to a different faith. Meanwhile pressure groups such as CAIR keep on screaming about 'Islamophobia'

Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Gaza: Israel strikes back after Hamas launches over 70 missiles.

(Gaza) The last time Hamas went to Egypt for talks, they ended up launching waves of missiles into Israel, with the Jewish state retaliating with the heaviest response since their last war with Hamas in 2014 on their return.


Yesterday Hamas returned to Egypt for more talks and yesterday Hamas launched over 70 missiles into Israel injuring 15 people and earning a response form the IDF in kind injuring 2 people.


So the questions I have to ask are, if Gaza is under seige, how does it get its Iranian made weaponry from? and as seen twice in under a month, Hamas and not Israel is the one causing all the trouble, yet according to the liberals, the left and the Islamic world, Israel is at fault...Really?

UK: 3 Pakistani Pedophiles to be stripped of British citizenship

(London)  After the Times revealed the extent of Pakistani rape gangs operating with impunity across the UK in 2011, the powers that be, which had previously turned a blind eye to the peccadilloes of these gangs were forced to act due to public revulsion and pressure and since 2011, out of the 264 males jailed for sexual exploitation of young children, 222 have been South Asian and predominantly Pakistani.


One such case in Rochdale in 2012  (Not to be confused with the initial case regards Rotherham)  saw 9 men jailed for the abuse on 47 young girls. All the abusers bar one were British/Pakistani and the one who wasn't was an Afghan asylum seeker. 

Well as 4 of these paedophile rapists held duel British and Pakistani citizenship, the Government moved to strip them of their British passports and deport them back to the land of their birth. Well that didn't go down with the four of them and they took the Government to court and in 2016, they lost, so they appealed on the grounds of their human rights and they lost again, so they appealed again and yesterday they lost yet again with 3 of them who have since been released from prison, told that they will be stripped of their British citizenships and deported.

Abdul Aziz, Adil Khan and Qari Abdul Rauf 
However that said  the senior judge Lord Justice Sales stated that, if deportation orders are signed against them, they will have the right to appeal on human rights grounds and that process is likely to take ‘many months’. You couldn't make it up if you tried. The remaining Pakistani paedophile 64 year old ringleader Shabir Ahmed, was jailed for 22 years (with another year added for assault) and despite him screaming in court (which saw him thrown into jail for the rest of the court case) that this was a white conspiracy out to attack Muslims, he too is going to find out the hard way how to get by as a 80 year old nonce living in the motherland. 

Its international cat day

Friday, August 3, 2018

Interlude:The Sounds Of Silence by Simon & Garfunkel