(London) Have you noticed how with having the most blood on their hands all round the world, Muslims love to play the victim card for themselves in which to divert attention away from their intolerant behaviour towards others?
In the UK, a self appointed group Tell Mama tried to tell the world how intolerant the UK was towards Muslims. Last November, to much fanfare, Tell Mama accused the police of failing to investigate anti-Muslim abuse. Oh, how the liberal world took the facts and figures parroted from this (at the time) government-funded anti-hate group. It cited 1,432 cases of abuse in 22 months up to Nov 13.
Then something strange happened, people dissected those facts and figures and came up with truth: that 57% of incidents recorded by Tell Mama in the week after the Woolwich murder were online incidents and most of them were from... abroad. Cressida Dick of the Metropolitan Police said that her force, which is one of the only forces which monitors anti-Muslim incidents, had seen fewer anti-Muslim incidents than after the 7 July bombings in 2005.
And yet to the liberal world, Muslims can only be victims. After numerous court cases regarding child paedophilia involving Islamic men, the Left still refuse to refer to these gangs as... paedophiles. Do a search on the bBC news website and prove me wrong. (I've looked.)
Well, Tell Mama lost a lot of credibility with those made up claims and they lost their government funding. But that didn't stop the bBC from calling up these lying bastards from playing the victim card for the most intolerant people in the UK.
Well, guess what, they've only gone and claimed the exact same thing:
It found that between May 2013 and February of this year, there were 734 self-reported cases of anti-Islamic abuse - equivalent to more than two a day on average.
Of these, 599 were incidents of online abuse and threats, the study found, while the rest were "offline" attacks such as violence, spreading of anti-Muslim literature, threats and assaults.
So, hang on. 600 (well, 1 short) out of 734 of anti-Islamic reported acts of abuse over a period of 10 months from a country with a population of 60 million was ethereal and not actually physical acts and, as dissected before, I wonder how much of that abuse was from abroad.
Now, before any left-wing ethical latte drinkers have a go at me for being a racist, I am brown skinned, I have an Islamic name and I live in a small British market town which is predominately... white. So, if I can walk about in peace and safety (I own Sash windows which cost me £1,200 each, and they haven't been smashed), then why can't the rest of these Muslims?
I want for nothing more than everyone to live in peace. Yes, there are bigots and racists in the UK, but you know what, I see far more from the ranks of the non-White population than from within it. Now, if only these so called victims would start to address the idiots within their midst.
In the UK, a self appointed group Tell Mama tried to tell the world how intolerant the UK was towards Muslims. Last November, to much fanfare, Tell Mama accused the police of failing to investigate anti-Muslim abuse. Oh, how the liberal world took the facts and figures parroted from this (at the time) government-funded anti-hate group. It cited 1,432 cases of abuse in 22 months up to Nov 13.
Then something strange happened, people dissected those facts and figures and came up with truth: that 57% of incidents recorded by Tell Mama in the week after the Woolwich murder were online incidents and most of them were from... abroad. Cressida Dick of the Metropolitan Police said that her force, which is one of the only forces which monitors anti-Muslim incidents, had seen fewer anti-Muslim incidents than after the 7 July bombings in 2005.
And yet to the liberal world, Muslims can only be victims. After numerous court cases regarding child paedophilia involving Islamic men, the Left still refuse to refer to these gangs as... paedophiles. Do a search on the bBC news website and prove me wrong. (I've looked.)
Well, Tell Mama lost a lot of credibility with those made up claims and they lost their government funding. But that didn't stop the bBC from calling up these lying bastards from playing the victim card for the most intolerant people in the UK.
Well, guess what, they've only gone and claimed the exact same thing:
Muslims remain among the most likely minority group in Britain to be targeted for a hate crime.So, let's look at these latest figures, shall we?
It found that between May 2013 and February of this year, there were 734 self-reported cases of anti-Islamic abuse - equivalent to more than two a day on average.
Of these, 599 were incidents of online abuse and threats, the study found, while the rest were "offline" attacks such as violence, spreading of anti-Muslim literature, threats and assaults.
So, hang on. 600 (well, 1 short) out of 734 of anti-Islamic reported acts of abuse over a period of 10 months from a country with a population of 60 million was ethereal and not actually physical acts and, as dissected before, I wonder how much of that abuse was from abroad.
Now, before any left-wing ethical latte drinkers have a go at me for being a racist, I am brown skinned, I have an Islamic name and I live in a small British market town which is predominately... white. So, if I can walk about in peace and safety (I own Sash windows which cost me £1,200 each, and they haven't been smashed), then why can't the rest of these Muslims?
I want for nothing more than everyone to live in peace. Yes, there are bigots and racists in the UK, but you know what, I see far more from the ranks of the non-White population than from within it. Now, if only these so called victims would start to address the idiots within their midst.
