(Liverpool) Today, a gang of 9 males were found guilty of rape, sex trafficking and sexual grooming of minors. For years, stories have abound about how Islamic males have a predilection for underage white girls. Yet any attempt to state the bleeding obvious has been met with a deluge of racism by the left and, of course, from the Islamic community. Even after gang after gang after gang of Islamic paedophiles have been found guilty and jailed in the UK, the ethical latte crowd still subscribe to the notion that this isn't a problem within the Islamic community.
The bBC, when it aired this story today, used the all encompassing term of "Asian" to describe the men, yet the fact remains - 8 were Pakistani and the other was from Afghanistan.
What really is most disturbing about this story is how in 2008, one of the victims reported that she was being abused by the gang, DNA evidence was found and after a year's investigation, the Crown prosecution service decided not to prosecute because they didn't think they would win in a court of law.
Subsequently, the victim was abused for another 2 years by these odious creatures until the police reopened the case. Now I wonder why the CPS didn't want to prosecute in 2008? Could it be that all this banding about of racism, Islamophobia and how only Muslims can be victims has polarised the British legal system into looking the other way when it comes to the peccadilloes of the Islamic male?
Even today, the police are making sure that the public are informed how this vile practice entirely centred on the Pakistani Islamic community isn't down to one specific ethnic group:
Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood of Greater Manchester Police (GMP) denied that the ethnicity of either the defendants or the victims was a factor.
(L-R top row) Adil Khan, Mohammed Amin, Abdul Rauf, Mohammed Sajid
(L-R bottom row) Abdul Aziz, Abdul Qayyum, Hamid Safi and Kabeer Hassan
The bBC, when it aired this story today, used the all encompassing term of "Asian" to describe the men, yet the fact remains - 8 were Pakistani and the other was from Afghanistan.
What really is most disturbing about this story is how in 2008, one of the victims reported that she was being abused by the gang, DNA evidence was found and after a year's investigation, the Crown prosecution service decided not to prosecute because they didn't think they would win in a court of law.
Subsequently, the victim was abused for another 2 years by these odious creatures until the police reopened the case. Now I wonder why the CPS didn't want to prosecute in 2008? Could it be that all this banding about of racism, Islamophobia and how only Muslims can be victims has polarised the British legal system into looking the other way when it comes to the peccadilloes of the Islamic male?
Even today, the police are making sure that the public are informed how this vile practice entirely centred on the Pakistani Islamic community isn't down to one specific ethnic group:
Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood of Greater Manchester Police (GMP) denied that the ethnicity of either the defendants or the victims was a factor.
"It is not a racial issue," he said. "This is about adults preying on vulnerable young children."Really? Then I wonder, when out of 52 suspects recently charged in the UK with sexual grooming of minors, 83% were Pakistani, 11% Asian other and 6% white British, how this isn't a racial issue? I don't know what is then. But to the left, this is a subject which just can't be touched in the name of racial equality, and so the vile practice continues. Which explains why the oldest of the men found guilty (59) cannot be named for legal reasons. Get that? A 59-year-old paedophile cannot be named. Only in the UK would the police not name a rapist and hand back a victim to her abusers. And we wonder why people are flocking to the far right.
