(London) If you've followed this blog for a while, you may have noted that I have very little time for the BBC. For a good few years, I've (as well as others) noticed that the BBC promotes a left-wing agenda totally divorced from the facts on the ground. To that end, it will support any cause which is anti-white (I am brown skinned, btw), anti-English, anti-American and, most of all, anti-Semitic.
For me the watershed moment transpired when I realised how bad the BBC had become when days after the attacks on 9/11 the BBC aired a special 'Question-time' program, and I noticed that while nobody had pointed the finger at Islamic terrorists (we suspected but had no proof), the BBC had loaded its audience with lots of America hating Muslims who had no problem bringing the former US ambassador to tears with their joy and jubilation at the death toll on that ugly, ugly day.
In 2005, when the bombs went off in London, the BBC refrained from calling the terrorists who murdered 62 people, by referring to them as misguided criminals. The same transpired with the murderers of British Soldier Lee Rigby, with the BBC promoting the view that the men who beheaded this soldier were (and are) the real victims. And that actually Muslims in the UK are the real victims when it comes to physical murderous attacks in the UK.
And there's the issue about how a former British spy chief accused the BBC of feeding young children 'Al Qaeda' propaganda:
Well, so the white liberal whitewash of Islamic hate crimes continues at the BBC. Today the BBC reveals that one of the Tsarnaev brothers, who with his brother planned and set off those bombs in Boston, isn't actually a Muslim but rather a white supremacist. Apparently, the BBC went around asking all their (Tsarnaev brothers') friends about these two terrorists. I quote:
Got to love the BBC or what?
For me the watershed moment transpired when I realised how bad the BBC had become when days after the attacks on 9/11 the BBC aired a special 'Question-time' program, and I noticed that while nobody had pointed the finger at Islamic terrorists (we suspected but had no proof), the BBC had loaded its audience with lots of America hating Muslims who had no problem bringing the former US ambassador to tears with their joy and jubilation at the death toll on that ugly, ugly day.
And there's the issue about how a former British spy chief accused the BBC of feeding young children 'Al Qaeda' propaganda:
Well, so the white liberal whitewash of Islamic hate crimes continues at the BBC. Today the BBC reveals that one of the Tsarnaev brothers, who with his brother planned and set off those bombs in Boston, isn't actually a Muslim but rather a white supremacist. Apparently, the BBC went around asking all their (Tsarnaev brothers') friends about these two terrorists. I quote:
"One of the brothers suspected of carrying out the Boston bombings was in possession of right-wing American literature in the run-up to the attack, BBC Panorama has learnt. Tamerlan Tsarnaev subscribed to publications espousing white supremacy and government conspiracy theories."And:
"Reading material he had about white supremacy commented that "Hitler had a point".And:
"A spokesperson for Tamerlan's mosque in Cambridge, Nicole Mossalam, said Tamerlan only prayed there occasionally. She portrayed him as an angry young man who latched onto Islam. "As far as connecting with the Islamic community here, to actually praying, being involved, doing acts of charity… all of those were pretty much lacking."And (the classic whitewash):
"I would say he was just a Muslim of convenience,"If you can access the video in the link above, Hilary Andersson asks the leading question; "What was behind the Boston bombing?" According to her, it was all the fault of the US for denying Tamerlan Tsarnaev the right to box for the US and that actually he was just an angry young man who took his revenge on the US because of that and not because he was an Islamic radical and terrorist.
Got to love the BBC or what?
