Hebrew University researches survey finds that during five-year 2nd Intifada had "almost no impact" on Jewish Israelis.
(JPost) Most Israelis who lived through the horrendous second intifada a decade ago – during which over 1,000 of their countrymen died – recall it as a traumatic period of terror.
But a study by researchers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem based on surveys conducted at the time found that the five-year period of intensive Palestinian terrorism had “almost no impact” on Jewish Israelis self-reported satisfaction levels yet adversely affected the happiness of Arab Israelis.
The research was conducted by Dr. Asaf Zussman from HU’s economics department, together with researchers from the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) and the Bank of Israel. The report – “Does Terrorism Demoralize? Evidence from Israel” – was published in the January 2012 edition of the journal Economica.
Zussman analyzed CBS surveys conducted from 2002 to 2005 among 22,000 Israelis.
Each year, the surveys asked a different group of 7,000 people dozens of questions, including “Overall, are you satisfied with your life?” The surveys showed that Israeli Jews’ self-reported satisfaction levels remained stable despite changing levels of terrorism.
In 2002, considered the most violent year of the second intifada, 82.9 percent of Israelis stated that they were “very satisfied” or “fairly satisfied” with their lives; in 2003, which was calmer, 81.7% of Israelis expressed satisfaction; and in the following, even calmer year of 2004, the percentage was 82.4%.
“The research shows that the level of life satisfaction among Israelis is less affected by terror than we are accustomed to think,” Zussman said. “Even in 2002, at the peak of the intifada, Jewish Israeli citizens were content enough with their lives to be placed at a good middle spot in comparison with other Western countries.”
On the other hand, Israeli Arabs’ life satisfaction displayed a robust negative reaction to terrorism. The researchers suggested this may be related to increasing concerns about discrimination in response to terror attacks.
The study found that while terrorism did not significantly alter happiness levels, the weather did. People attested to being less happy during periods of unusually bad weather than on pleasant sunny days.
Zussman suggested that one possible explanation for terrorism’s minimal effect is the public’s trust in the government’s strategy to defeat terrorism.
“During the intifada, and especially since the spring of 2002, Israel’s counterterrorism strategy proved successful in reducing Palestinian terrorism,” he said. “This may help to explain why the Israeli public did not become demoralized.
Also, over the years the Israeli public has developed a resiliency and managed to adjust to terrorism, with optimism that terrorism is a temporary situation and that things will look better soon.”
The study raises doubts about the effectiveness of terrorism in achieving one of its main objectives – demoralizing the enemy population.
“Terrorism is a political instrument meant firstly to create psychological demoralization among the enemy,” Zussman said, “but it would seem that it’s not as useful as one would think.”
